CONSIDERATIONS AND REFLECTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL POLICY 4.0: BRIEF ANALYSIS OF ARGENTINA AND BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoecb.v1i1.7Keywords:
Industrial policy; industry 4.0; state capacityAbstract
Historically, industrial policy has been the object of constant discussion and controversy both in the theoretical context and in the sphere of economic policy in developed and developing countries. In this sense, the main focus of this article is to approach, in an exploratory and contextual way, the issue of industrial policy and its relationship with industry 4.0, mainly in the Latin American context. Specifically, aspects related to the role of the State and its capacity as an orchestrator of industrial policy are discussed, as well as the entire institutional context that involves the innovative process and the implementation of industrial policy 4.0. Finally, a documentary analysis of the main instrument for guiding industrial policy 4.0 in Argentina and Brazil was carried out. The main final considerations of the research point to an accelerated deindustrialization of both countries in recent years and to a recent policy of industry 4.0 in the initial stages or of "socioeconomic preparation" of the system, as well as a "passive" policy due to the character of its objectives and the horizon guided by actions that do not involve large technological development projects or import substitution in the long term.
References
ALEKSEEV, Alexander N. et al. Stages of formation of industry 4.0 and the key indicators of its development. In: Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 93-100.
AMABLE, Bruno. The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2003.
AREZKI, Mr Rabah et al. Testing the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis since 1650: Evidence from panel techniques that allow for multiple breaks. International Monetary Fund, 2013.
ARGENTINA. Plan de Desarrollo productivo 4.0. Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo: Buenos Aires, 2021.
BRASIL. Plano de Ação da Câmara Brasileira da Indústria 4.0 (2019-22). São Paulo, 2019.
BOYER, Robert. Estado, mercado e desenvolvimento: uma nova síntese para o século XXI?. Economia e Sociedade, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-20, 1999.
BRUNDENIUS, Claes; LUNDVALL, Bengt-Åke; SUTZ, Judith. The role of universities in innovation systems in developing countries. En Handbook on Innovation Systems in Developing Countries. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009. p. 311-336.
CANTU, Rodrigo. Ensaios sobre as transformações das finanças públicas brasileiras. 177 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia) - Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2016
CENTENO, Miguel Ángel. Sangre y Deuda: Ciudades, Estado y construcción de nación en América Latina. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Instituto de Estudios Urbanos-IEU, 2014.
CHAMINADE, Cristina; EDQUIST, Charles. From theory to practice: the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change A Research Handbook, p. 141-163, 2006.
CHANG, Ha-Joon. Chutando a escada: a estratégia do desenvolvimento em perspectiva histórica. Unesp, 2004.
CHERIF, Reda; HASANOV, Fuad. The return of the policy that shall not be named: Principles of industrial policy. International Monetary Fund, 2019.
CHIARINI, Tulio; CALIARI, Thiago. A Economia Política do Patenteamento na América Latina: Tecnologia e Inovação a Favor do Desenvolvimento. Paco e Littera, 2019.
CORIAT, Benjamin; WEINSTEIN, Olivier. National institutional frameworks, institutional complementarities and sectoral systems of innovation. In: Sectoral systems of innovation, concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe, MALERBA, F. (org). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
CUEVAS, Benjamín; CANTU, Rodrigo. Crises fiscais e construção do estado: Argentina e Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Iniciação Científica, v. 7, n. 2, p. 95-106, 2020.
DAHMER QUINZANI, M. A. Perspectivas de uma nova agenda de política industrial: os desafios da indústria brasileira no pós-pandemia da Covid-19. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Curitiba, Brasil, v. 2, n. 2, p. 153–171, 2021. DOI: 10.51798/sijis.v2i2.51.
DE MATOS NASCIMENTO, Victor. Neoliberalismo e Democracia na América do Sul: Um estudo sobre Argentina, Brasil e Chile. Conjuntura Global, v. 8, n. 2, 2019.
DE SOUZA, Yalle Hugo; SECCHI, Leonardo. Extinção de políticas públicas. Síntese teórica sobre a fase esquecida do policy cycle. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, v. 20, n. 66, 2015.
EVANS, P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Nova Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1995.
EVANS, Peter. Autonomia e parceria: Estados e transformação industrial. UFRJ, 2004.
FERRAZ, João Carlos; DE PAULA, Germano Mendes; KUPFER, David. Política industrial. In: Economia industrial. Elsevier Editora Ltda., 2013. p. 313-323.
FIALKA, John J. War by other means: Economic espionage in America. WW Norton & Company, 1999.
FREEMAN, Chris. The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 5-24, 1995.
FREEMAN, Chris; SOETE, Luc. A economia da inovação industrial. Editora da UNICAMP, 2008.
FURTADO, João. Indústria 4.0: a quarta revolução industrial e os desafios para a indústria e para o desenvolvimento brasileiro. BNDES: Brasilia, 2017.
GALANTUCCI, Luigi M. et al. Additive Manufacturing: New Trends in the 4 th Industrial Revolution. In: International Conference on the Industry 4.0 model for Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham, 2019. p. 153-169.
GOMES, Gerson; TAVARES, Maria da Conceição. La CEPAL y la integración económica de América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL, 1998.
GOMIDE, A. A.; PEREIRA, Ana Karine; MACHADO, Raphael. O conceito de capacidade estatal e a pesquisa científica. Sociedade e Cultura, v. 20, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2017.
GOMULKA, Stanislaw. L'incompatibilité entre le socialisme et l'innovation rapide. Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, v. 15, n. 3, p. 91-104, 1984.
HERMAN, M.; PENTEK, T.; OTTO, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios,[w:] TX Bui, RH Sprague Jr. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS2016. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Los Alamitos–Washington–Tokyo. 2016.
HUGHES, Thomas P. Technological momentum. In. Does technology drive history? In Marx, Leo & Smith, Merritt Roe (eds) The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
KOTHA, Suresh; SWAMIDASS, Paul M. Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from US manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, v. 18, n. 3, p. 257-277, 2000.
KUO, Chu-Chi; SHYU, Joseph Z.; DING, Kun. Industrial revitalization via industry 4.0–A comparative policy analysis among China, Germany and the USA. Global transitions, v. 1, p. 3-14, 2019.
LASCOUMES, Pierre; LE GALÈS, Patrick. A ação pública abordada pelos seus instrumentos. Revista Pós Ciências Sociais, v. 9, n. 18, 2012.
LIAO, Yongxin et al. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International journal of production research, v. 55, n. 12, p. 3609-3629, 2017.
MAJONE, Giandomenico. Public policy and administration: ideas, interests and institutions. A new handbook of political science, p. 610-27, 1996.
MALERBA, Franco (Ed.). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
MAZZUCATO, Marianna. O Estado empreendedor: desmascarando o mito do setor público vs. Setor privado. São Paulo: Portfolio-Penguin, 2014.
MINAYO, Maria Cecília; DESLANDES, Suely Ferreira; GOMES, Romeu. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Editora Vozes Limitada, 2011.
OREIRO, José Luis; FEIJÓ, Carmem A. Desindustrialização: conceituação, causas, efeitos e o caso brasileiro. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, v. 30, p. 219-232, 2010.
OSZLAK, C. Formación Histórica del Estado En América Latina: Elementos Teorico-Metodologicos para su estudio. IN: Acuña, Carlos, H. (comp.) Lecturas sobre el Estado y las políticas públicas: Retomando el debate de ayer para fortalecer el actual, Proyecto de Modernización del Estado, Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros. Buenos Aires, 2011.
PAULANI, Leda Maria. Não há saída sem a reversão da financeirização. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, p. 29-35, 2017.
PREBISCH, Raul. Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries. the American economic review, v. 49, n. 2, p. 251-273, 1959.
RODRIK, Dani. Premature deindustrialization. Journal of economic growth, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2016.
SCHNEIDER, Ben Ross. Designing Industrial Policy in Latin America: Business-State Relations and the New Developmentalism. Nova Iorque: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015.
SCHNEIDER, Ben Ross. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
SECCHI, Leonardo. Políticas públicas: conceitos, esquemas de análise, casos práticos. Cengage Learning, 2014.
SILVA, Luana Naves Ferreira; MELO, Lívia Carolina Machado; ARAÚJO, Leandro Vieira Lima. O fenômeno da desindustrialização no Brasil e Argentina: uma análise comparada. Revista Iniciativa Econômica, v. 3, n. 2, 2017.
SKOCPOL, Theda. Cultural idioms and political ideologies in the revolutionary reconstruction of state power: A rejoinder to Sewell. The Journal of Modern History, v. 57, n. 1, p. 86-96, 1985.
TILLY, Charles. Coerção, capital e Estados europeus 1990-1992. São Paulo: Edusp, 1996.
WADE, Robert H. Return of industrial policy?. International review of applied economics, v. 26, n. 2, p. 223-239, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcos Vinicius Iglesias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
